LIBR 210-02
Reference and Information Services
Summer 2010 Greensheet

Dr. Johanna Tunon
E-mail -- For class-related communications, use the ANGEL course email.
Home phone: (954) 792-6814 
Office location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Office hours: By appointment by phone or via Elluminate. NOTE: I live in Florida so I am on Eastern Daylight time. You are welcome to call before 10 pm Eastern Daylight time.

I will email you with your access enrollment code for your class site. Links with tutorials on how to use Angel are provided above.

Course Description

Catalog Description: A process-oriented examination of how information professionals answer reference questions. The interpersonal skills required for effective question negotiation and the sources with which questions are answered are stressed.

Full Description: This course provides an overview of reference and information services. We will be examining and evaluating key information sources in a variety of formats and becoming familiar with professional resources. Because the field of librarianship is changing rapidly, we will be exploring various methods and models for delivering information and examining how emerging trends and ways to use new ideas and skills may impact the future of reference services and access to information.

Course Prerequisites: LIBR 202 required.

Course Objectives

Student Learning Outcomes
At the end of this course, students will:

• Have a developed understanding of the reference process
• Use basic reference tools and search techniques to answer a wide range of questions;
• Conduct an effective reference interview;
• Make the connection between user needs, information resources, and the relevant information technology;
• Assess the quality and usefulness of reference sources;
• Evaluate reference services that address the needs of today’s dynamic and cultural diverse society;
• Understand the relationship between reference service and information literacy instruction;
• Be familiar with current issues and trends in reference service;
• Begin to develop a personal philosophy of reference service.

LIBR 210 supports the following SLIS Core Competencies:

• Use service concepts, principles and techniques that facilitate information access, relevance, and accuracy for individuals or groups of users.

In addition, this section supports the following SLIS core competencies:

• Retrieve, evaluate, and synthesize scholarly and professional literature for informed decision-making by specific client groups;
• Demonstrate proficiency in the use of current information and communication technologies, and other related technologies, as they affect the resources and uses of libraries and other types of information providing entities;
• Evaluate programs and services on specified criteria.

Top of Page

Course Requirements

• Assignment 1
  Mini exercises 24% (3% X 8 weeks)
  (E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, E7, E8, E9)
• Assignment 2
  Reference desk library and online visits 21% (7 x 3%)
  (Part of weekly discussion topics for Wks 2-8)
  ( R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8)
• Assignment 3
  BI session via Elluminate 15%
  or pathfinder/subject guide
  (Completed during Wks 6, 7)  (A3)
• Assignment 4
  Reference desk shadowing (15%) Due Wk 8
  ** Optional - four article summaries as alternative to shadowing activity. (A4)  Choose 3 of the available weekly topics and post summaries in the A4 dropbox
• Assignment 5
  Reference bibliography 17% = 15% (individual work) 2% (group submission) 
  Due Wk 9. (A5)
• Participation/discussion topics 8% (8 x 1%) (Participation is posted every four weeks -- 1-4, 5-8 (P6, P11, P16)
• SOTES -- extra credit (0.5%)

Course Calendar

*These due dates are subject to change with fair notice. 

Description of Assignments and Grading Criteria
NOTE: If you have some special circumstance that makes completion of some activities difficult, contact me about possible alternative activities.

• Assignment 1: Mini Exercises 24% (3% X 8 weeks) E2 - E9
  In eight out of the sixteen weeks of class, we will have mini exercises that will have you actually look for appropriate sources to information quest questions or examine specific types of resources. Post the mini exercises in the Digital Dropboxs provided. The activities will be graded using the following criteria:
  
  Grading criteria:
  • (1) Correct responses were identified and (2) the source listed. If the answer for a question was not located, the student demonstrated due diligence by providing at least five appropriate authoritative sources that were checked for the answer. Correct grammar was used.
  • Appropriate sources -- A variety of print and appropriate electronic reference resources were used to completely answer information requests. Only authoritative Web reference resources were utilized. 
     
• Assignment 2: Reference desk library and online visits 21% (7 x 3%)
  R3 - R8
  Because the discussions in Weeks 2 to 8 require more than just commenting on various topics, I am giving you additional credit for the discussion topics for these weeks. In other words, these activities are part of weekly discussion topics for Weeks 2-8 so they are part of your submissions for those weekly discussions. You will be asked to visit a library or use some kind of reference service and report on your findings so you will get extra points for the discussion topics for these weeks.  Address the questions asked for the designated week. Each week's posting will be graded on:
  • Address the questions asked for the designated week.
  • Used appropriate grammar and communicated in a professional manner.
  • Substantive content
  • Applied what you have learned in the textbook readings to the topic under discussion.
     
• Assignment 3:  BI Session via Elluminate or Precorded Session 
  or Pathfinder/Subject Guide (15%)
  
  BI Session via Elluminate or Prerecorded
  Assignment 3 is designed to give students the opportunity to use Elluminate for a short (7-10 minute) introduction to a subscription database at SJSU or a library in your area or you can use a Web 2.0 application. You also have the option to use a technology such as Captivate, podcasts, Jing, etc, to create a prerecorded presentation if you prefer.  In addition to giving students to opportunity to teach in an online environment, the sessions also provide the rest of the class with an introduction to some relevant databases and Web 2.0 applications that they might not otherwise become familiar with. The presentation can be done using the share application or using a PowerPoint presentation. I have requested student assistants to help with any questions about using Elluminate or loading PowerPoint files. Any supplemental instructional materials such as a handout or Web resource are optional. The sign-up wiki page is located in the Lessons folder. I do not expect you to be present for all the live presentations. Since you will want to get an overview of the various resources, you will be able to see the archived sessions when you cannot participate live.
  
  Grading Criteria:
  • The student presenter introduced him or herself and explained the goals for the instructional session.
  • Instructional session was well organized and covered the major points about the selected database or Web 2.0 application.
  • The presentation made clear how the database or Web 2.0 application might be useful for reference librarians.
  • The student presenter presented the materials clearly and succinctly.
  • The PowerPoint was well designed , prerecorded video, or the share application was utilized in a clear and logical manner.
  • The student presenter was knowledgeable about the topic selected. 

OR

Pathfinder/Subject Guide

Develop a pathfinder on a topic useful for helping library patrons find relevant resources on a topic of interest. It can be a two-sided handout to use at a reference desk or organized as a web subject guide or using a template like LibGuides is you have access to that. You can take a look at examples of some other LIBR 210 pathfinders at http://ischoolapps.sjsu.edu/wikis/faculty/reference/index.php/LIBR_210_Student_Pathfinder_Projects

• Grading Criteria:
  
  • The pathfinder provided clear information about the scope of the tool.
  • The pathfinder addressed the identified information need.
  • The pathfinder provided appropriate subject headings, call numbers, and names and URLs for websites as appropriate.
  • The pathfinder was attractive, well laid out, and appropriate for the age and ability level of the intended user(s).
  • The pathfinder identified a variety of appropriate resources for the information need.
  • The pathfinder organized the information in a clear and concise manner.
  • The pathfinder used correct grammar and writing mechanics.

• Assignment 4: Reference Desk Shadowing (15%)
  Write a summary of and conclusions about your experience shadowing a reference librarian for two hours at the reference desk. Use the grading criteria when writing about your summary of the experience and your conclusions. For people who cannot complete this activity for whatever reason, you can opt to complete two additional article summaries as an alternative to shadowing a reference librarian at the referenc desk.
  
  Grading Criteria:
  • A clear and robust summary of the reference desk shadowing experience is provided.
  • The discussion of the experience is framed in terms of the criteria for conducting good reference interviews provided in the textbook by Cassell and Hiremath.
  • Describe what types of web, print, and databases were used by the librarian to answer reference questions.
  • Describe your conclusions or reflections about what you learned because of this experience. For example, did anything unexpected occur? Did you think that Cassell and Hiremath's recommended steps for a reference interview worked in real life? What types of reference resources worked well when "in the trenches"? Did you learn anything new from talking with the reference librarian?
  • Good writing mechanics and grammar were used. 
      

OR

Article Summaries 15% (3 X 5%)
Choose 3 out of 8 topics. Post the summaries in the dropbox provided for Assignment 4, and you are also encouraged to incorporate what you learned to inform your participation for the weekly discussions. Topics include reference interviews (f2f, phone, email, digital), information literacy, bibliographic instruction, reference research, serving special populations, Web 2.0, distance reference services, roving or embedded reference, outreach services, reader's advisory, or the future of reference services.


Grading Criteria:

- Create a friendly environment for that week’s discussion topic.
- Start the week with an introduction to the topic under discussion.
- End the week’s discussion by summarizing the ideas discussed.
- Prompt participants to pursue their ideas.
- Encourage participation and sharing of ideas.
 

• Assignment 5: Reference Bibliography/Group Projects 17% = 15% (individual's resources and annotations) 2% (group's bibliography)
  The goal of this assignment is for the class to have a list of current and relevant reference resources as an update for the textbook. You will be working in groups to identify the best reference online and print resources for public/academic libraries  or school libraries published or updated in 2008 or later in your subject area. This means that you can include both classic reference resources as long as they have been updated since in 2008 or later or new reference resources. Do not worry if there is some overlap of resources listed in the General/Multidisciplinary list and the specific subject areas. The final product needs to be formatted using APA for the reference citations, and short annotations are included with a critical evaluation of each source that includes information on the coverage and scope, format, authority, treatment, arrangement, special features, and cost (if appropriate) of your selected resources. Also include imprint/publication information (name of publisher, place, and date of publication), frequency, the audience, uses, limitations, and a description of why the resource was selected. It will help ensure consistency if you use a format that lists the price, type, and audience. There is a wiki in Week 2 for identifying work groups based on areas of inter. You can choose from General/Multidisciplinary, School Media Resources, Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences, and Sciences/Technology. First come, first serve with a maximum of seven students per subject area. Each group can decide on how to divide your work, but to facilitate grading, use the dropbox to submit your individual list of resources and annotations. Each group's final product will be posted in the Assignment 5 forum so others will also be able to benefit from it. The majority of your grade will be based on your selection of resources and annotations, and 2% of your grade will be based on the group’s overall preparation of the bibliography for Assignment 5.
  
  Grading Criteria:
  • Group work in subject areas and overall design
  • Appropriate selection of resources for subject area
  • Solid justification for the choices is provided
  • Information about the coverage and scope, format, authority, treatment, arrangement, special features, and cost (if appropriate) of the resources were accurate, well organized, and concise.
  • APA formatting.
     
• Participation 8% 1% x 8 Grades
  Class participation is an important part of the class and can take a variety of forms throughout the course including the Elluminate classroom sessions, asking good questions that move the direction of the course forward, participation on various topics posted in the discussion board throughout the term, and responding constructively to others’ postings. Your participation can take the form of active listening that incorporates or builds on comments by other students, thoughtful questions, suggestions, addressing related issues, and making observations based on personal or professional experiences and/or class readings. Although positive reinforcement is good, participation that does not add to the discussion (e.g., comments like “Yes, I agree” and “Good point!” will not be counted toward your participation grade.  I will post the participation grades at the end of Weeks  1-4 and Week 2 5-8.
  
  Grading Criteria:
  • Content – Comments and questions are substantive and relate to the topic. Your responses were relevant to the topics addressed in the class and show that you were prepared for the class discussion and were applying the principles learned in the class text.
  • Organization -- Comments are presented in logical manner and concise.
  • Knowledge – Comments reflect knowledge about research and your readings in the text book, your postings in the reading blog, and any other professional literature. Support your comments with concrete evidence when possible.
  • Active participation in the weekly discussion. Do not just post your comments and "lurk" or disappear for the rest of the week. Participation can take a number of forms including substantive responses, comments, questions, feedback for other students, and active listening. Evidence of active participation and listening can be seen in responses that incorporate or builds off the comments of others in the weekly discussion.
  • Used the professional literature and your text to support comments
  • Postings with relevant resources that you want to share with the class in the Course-Related Resources section would be considered a plus!
  • Communicate in a professional manner and avoid computer abbreviations like LOL. Correct grammar and writing mechanics. 
     

*** NOTE: The details of the asssignments, grading criteria, and grading rubrics are subject to minor adjustments with fair notice. 

Course Grading
All work is due by the date listed. If you are unable to complete the work by the assigned date, you need to email me to make alternative arrangements. No work will be accepted after the last day of class unless arrangements have been made in writing and approved for an incomplete. I provide feedback for mini activities, reading summaries by email so if you do not receive an email, let me know! Feedback for major projects will be posted in the gradebook when grades are posted.

Check the grading criteria with class assignments before submitting assignments to be sure that you are addressing all of the elements that should be included in the assignments.

Textbooks and Readings

Information about additional readings from online articles, Web resources, and videos will be posted as the semester progresses, but there will be no additional textbooks for the class that you need to purchase. Just FYI: We will be using APA for formatting of text and reference citations so you may want to get the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.), but that is not required. I will provide some resources that can help with the APA rules.

No Textbooks For This Course

Grading Scale

The standard SJSU School of Information Grading Scale is utilized for all iSchool courses:

In order to provide consistent guidelines for assessment for graduate level work in the School, these terms are applied to letter grades:

• C represents Adequate work; a grade of "C" counts for credit for the course;
• B represents Good work; a grade of "B" clearly meets the standards for graduate level work;
  For core courses in the MLIS program (not MARA) — INFO 200, INFO 202, INFO 204 — the iSchool requires that students earn a B in the course. If the grade is less than B (B- or lower) after the first attempt you will be placed on administrative probation.  You must repeat the class the following semester. If -on the second attempt- you do not pass the class with a grade of B or better (not B- but B) you will be disqualified.
  
• A represents Exceptional work; a grade of "A" will be assigned for outstanding work only.

Students are advised that it is their responsibility to maintain a 3.0 Grade Point Average (GPA).

University Policies

General Expectations, Rights and Responsibilities of the Student

As members of the academic community, students accept both the rights and responsibilities incumbent upon all members of the institution. Students are encouraged to familiarize themselves with SJSU's policies and practices pertaining to the procedures to follow if and when questions or concerns about a class arises. See University Policy S90-5 at http://www.sjsu.edu/senate/docs/S90-5.pdf. More detailed information on a variety of related topics is available in the SJSU catalog at http://info.sjsu.edu/web-dbgen/catalog/departments/LIS.html. In general, it is recommended that students begin by seeking clarification or discussing concerns with their instructor. If such conversation is not possible, or if it does not serve to address the issue, it is recommended that the student contact the Department Chair as a next step.

Dropping and Adding

Students are responsible for understanding the policies and procedures about add/drop, grade forgiveness, etc. Refer to the current semester's Catalog Policies section at http://info.sjsu.edu/static/catalog/policies.html. Add/drop deadlines can be found on the current academic year calendars document on the Academic Calendars webpage at http://www.sjsu.edu/provost/services/academic_calendars/. The Late Drop Policy is available at http://www.sjsu.edu/aars/policies/latedrops/policy/. Students should be aware of the current deadlines and penalties for dropping classes.

Information about the latest changes and news is available at the Advising Hub at http://www.sjsu.edu/advising/.

Consent for Recording of Class and Public Sharing of Instructor Material

University Policy S12-7, http://www.sjsu.edu/senate/docs/S12-7.pdf, requires students to obtain instructor's permission to record the course and the following items to be included in the syllabus:

• "Common courtesy and professional behavior dictate that you notify someone when you are recording him/her. You must obtain the instructor's permission to make audio or video recordings in this class. Such permission allows the recordings to be used for your private, study purposes only. The recordings are the intellectual property of the instructor; you have not been given any rights to reproduce or distribute the material."
  • It is suggested that the syllabus include the instructor's process for granting permission, whether in writing or orally and whether for the whole semester or on a class by class basis.
  • In classes where active participation of students or guests may be on the recording, permission of those students or guests should be obtained as well.
• "Course material developed by the instructor is the intellectual property of the instructor and cannot be shared publicly without his/her approval. You may not publicly share or upload instructor generated material for this course such as exam questions, lecture notes, or homework solutions without instructor consent."

Academic integrity

Your commitment, as a student, to learning is evidenced by your enrollment at San Jose State University. The University Academic Integrity Policy F15-7 at http://www.sjsu.edu/senate/docs/F15-7.pdf requires you to be honest in all your academic course work. Faculty members are required to report all infractions to the office of Student Conduct and Ethical Development. The Student Conduct and Ethical Development website is available at http://www.sjsu.edu/studentconduct/.

Campus Policy in Compliance with the American Disabilities Act

If you need course adaptations or accommodations because of a disability, or if you need to make special arrangements in case the building must be evacuated, please make an appointment with me as soon as possible, or see me during office hours. Presidential Directive 97-03 at http://www.sjsu.edu/president/docs/directives/PD_1997-03.pdf requires that students with disabilities requesting accommodations must register with the Accessible Education Center (AEC) at http://www.sjsu.edu/aec to establish a record of their disability.

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader to access PDF files.

More accessibility resources.